Skip to main content

How Unstable Are Complex Financial Systems? Analyzing an Inter-bank Network of Credit Relations

  • Chapter
Econophysics of Systemic Risk and Network Dynamics

Part of the book series: New Economic Windows ((NEW))

Abstract

The recent worldwide economic crisis of 2007–09 has focused attention on the need to analyze systemic risk in complex financial networks. We investigate the problem of robustness of such systems in the context of the general theory of dynamical stability in complex networks and, in particular, how the topology of connections influence the risk of the failure of a single institution triggering a cascade of successive collapses propagating through the network. We use data on bilateral liabilities (or exposure) in the derivatives market between 202 financial intermediaries based in USA and Europe in the last quarter of 2009 to empirically investigate the network structure of the over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives market. We observe that the network exhibits both heterogeneity in node properties and the existence of communities. It also has a prominent core-periphery organization and can resist large-scale collapse when subjected to individual bank defaults (however, failure of any bank in the core may result in localized collapse of the innermost core with substantial loss of capital) but is vulnerable to system-wide breakdown as a result of an accompanying liquidity crisis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The degree of a node is the number of links it possesses.

  2. 2.

    A financial intermediary is an institution, such as a bank, a credit union or a mortgage loan company, that transfers funds from investors (lenders) to those requiring capital (borrowers). For instance, a bank uses its deposits to provide loans or mortgages thereby mediating transactions between surplus and deficit agents [30].

  3. 3.

    Strength of a node is the sum of weights of all links belonging to it.

  4. 4.

    Bilateral netting, whose primary purpose is to reduce exposure to credit risk, is an arrangement between two parties to exchange only the net difference in their obligations to each other [36].

  5. 5.

    Except for the D L Evans Bank, for which the GNFV exactly equals the GNPV so that the total netted exposure is zero, all the other banks have no bilateral exposure at all with respect to any other bank in the network.

References

  1. Francis J (1850) Mammon and the money market. In: The church of England quarterly review, vol XXVII. W. E. Painter, Strand, London, p 142

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mackay C (1848) Extraordinary popular delusions and the madness of crowds. National Illustrated Library, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cassidy J (1998) Annals of finance: pricking the bubble. New Yorker. Aug 17, 1998. http://www.newyorker.com/archive/1998/08/17/

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sinha S, Chatterjee A, Chakraborti A, Chakrabarti BK (2011) Econophysics: an introduction. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chancellor E (2000) Devil take the hindmost: a history of financial speculation. Papermac, London

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ormerod P (2005) Why most things fail: evolution, extinction and economics. Faber and Faber, London

    Google Scholar 

  7. Allen F, Gale D (2000) Financial contagion. J Polit Econ 108:1–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schweitzer F, Fagiolo G, Sornette D, Vega-Redondo F, Vespignani A, White DR (2009) Economic networks: the new challenges. Science 325:422–425

    MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Tainter JA (1988) The collapse of complex societies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  10. McCann KS (2000) The diversity-stability debate. Nature 405:228–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. May RM (1973) Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sinha S, Sinha S (2005) Evidence of universality for the May–Wigner stability theorem for random networks with local dynamics. Phys Rev E 71:020902

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393:440–442

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. de Solla Price DJ (1976) A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. J Am Soc Inf Sci 27:292–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Barabasi A-L, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286:509–512

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sinha S (2005) Complexity vs stability in small-world networks. Physica A 346:147–153

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Brede M, Sinha S (2005) Assortative mixing by degree makes a network more unstable. http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0507710

  18. Sinha S (2010) Are large complex economic systems unstable? Sci Cult 76:454–458

    Google Scholar 

  19. May RM, Levin A, Sugihara G (2008) Ecology for bankers. Nature 451:893–895

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Haldane AG, May RM (2011) Systemic risk in banking ecosystems. Nature 469:351–355

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Soramäki K, Bech Arnold J ML, Glass RJ, Beyeler WE (2007) The topology of interbank payment flows. Physica A 379:317–333

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chatterjee N, Sinha S (2008) Understanding the mind of a worm: hierarchical network structure underlying nervous system function in C. elegans. Prog Brain Res 168:145–153

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ashraf I, Sinha S (2012) Core-periphery organization of graphemes in written sequences: decreasing positional rigidity with increasing core order. In: Gelbukh A (ed) CICLing 2012 part I. Springer lecture notes in computer science, vol 7181. pp 142–153

    Google Scholar 

  24. Boss M, Elsinger H, Summer M, Thurner S (2004) Network topology of the interbank market. Quant Finance 4:677–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sui P (2009) Financial contagion in the coreperiphery network. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/

  26. Inaoka H, Takayasu H, Shimizu T, Ninomiya T, Taniguchi K (2004) Self-similarity of banking network. Physica A 339:621–634

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Iori G, De Masi G, Precup OV, Gabbi G, Caldarelli G (2008) A network analysis of the Italian overnight money market. J Econ Dyn Control 32:259–278

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Fujiwara Y, Aoyama H, Ikeda Y, Iyetomi H, Souma W (2009) Structure and temporal change of credit network between banks and large firms in Japan. Econ E-J 3:2009-7

    Google Scholar 

  29. De Masi G, Fujiwara Y, Gallegati M, Greenwald B, Stiglitz JE (2010) An analysis of the Japanese credit network. Evol Inst Econ Rev 7:209–232

    Google Scholar 

  30. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_intermediary

  31. Furfine CH (2003) Interbank exposure: quantifying the risk of contagion. J Money Credit Bank 35:111–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gai P, Kapadia S (2010) Contagion in financial networks. Proc R Soc Lond A 466:2401–2423

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank

  34. Jiang L (2005) Mathematical modeling and methods of option pricing. World Scientific, Singapore

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Quarterly OCC Report on bank trading and derivatives fourth quarter 2009. Comptroller of the currency administrator of national banks. Washington DC. http://www.occ.treas.gov/topics/capital-markets/financial-markets/trading/derivatives/dq409.pdf

  36. http://riskinstitute.ch/00010538.htm

  37. Markose S, Giansante S, Gatkowski M, Shaghaghi AR (2010) Too interconnected to fail: financial contagion and systemic risk in network model of CDS and other credit enhancement obligations of US banks. University of Essex Discussion Paper 683. http://www.essex.ac.uk/economics/discussion-papers/papers-text/dp683.pdf

  38. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tier_1_capital

  39. Newman MEJ (2010) Networks: an introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Golub GH, Greif C (2006) An Arnoldi-type algorithm for computing page rank. BIT Numer Math 46:759–771

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Gleich D (2006) Pagerank package for MATLAB. http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/11613-pagerank

  42. Leicht EA, Newman MEJ (2008) Community structure in directed networks. Phys Rev Lett 100:118703

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. Markose S, Giansante S, Shaghaghi AR (2010) ‘Too interconnected to fail’ financial network of US CDS market: Topological fragility and systemic risk. J Econ Behav Organ, in press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank S Raghavendra for earlier discussions on this topic and F Abergel, N Ganguly and S S Manna for useful comments on the work during presentations at meetings in Kolkata and Bangalore. We are grateful to E Schöll for stimulating discussions and hospitality at TU-Berlin where part of the work was done.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sitabhra Sinha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sinha, S., Thess, M., Markose, S. (2013). How Unstable Are Complex Financial Systems? Analyzing an Inter-bank Network of Credit Relations. In: Abergel, F., Chakrabarti, B., Chakraborti, A., Ghosh, A. (eds) Econophysics of Systemic Risk and Network Dynamics. New Economic Windows. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2553-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics