Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A construction of consumer cognitive structures and their implications in furniture shopping decisions: a means-end chain approach

  • Empirical article
  • Published:
Service Business Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to construct a hierarchical value map (HVM) based on an investigation of how consumers in Taiwan link attributes of furniture and home accessories stores with particular consequences, and how these consequences satisfy their personal values. Further, this study compares differences in consumer HVMs in terms of gender, as well as across different chain stores. This study used the means-end chain approach and laddering technique to interview 40 consumers of furniture and home accessories stores in Taiwan. We obtained six ladders regarding furniture and home accessories store consumption. From these ladders, this study found three critical store attributes (function, facility convenience, and price), four consequences that consumers care most about (shopping ease, comfort and pleasure, practicality, and integrated design), and three dominant values that consumers wish to achieve (warm family, pleasurable life, and security). The findings of this study can be used as a basis for market segmentation and the development of retail service marketing strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrena R, Sanchez M (2009) Connecting product attributes with emotional benefits: analysis of a Mediterranean product across consumer age segments. Brit Food J 111(2):120–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gengler CE, Reynolds TJ (1995) Consumer understanding and advertising strategy: analysis and strategic translation of laddering data. J Advert Res 35(4):19–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunert KG, Beckmann SC, Sorensen E (2001) Means-end chains and laddering: an inventory of problems and an agenda for research. In: Reynolds TJ, Olson JC (eds) Understanding consumer decision making: the means-end approach to marketing and advertising strategy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 63–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutman J (1982) A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization process. J Mark 46(2):60–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haley R (1968) Benefit segmentation: a decision-oriented research tool. J Mark 32(3):30–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris G, Mitchell VW (2005) The importance of consumers’ perceived risk in retail strategy. Eur J Mark 39(7/8):821–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard JA (1977) Consumer behavior: application and theory. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahle LR, Kennedy P (1989) Use the list of values (LOV) to understand consumers. J Consum Mark 2(4):49–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassarjian HH (1977) Content analysis in consumer research. J Consum Res 4(1):8–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist JD (1974/1975) Meaning of image. J Retail 50(4):29–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Martineau P (1958) Social classes and spending behavior. J Mark 23:121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow A (1940) Test of dominance-feeling (self-esteem) in college women. J Soc Psychol 12:255–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mort GS, Rose T (2004) The effect of product type on value linkage in the means-end chain: Implications for theory and method. J Consum Behav 2(3):221–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers JH (1976) Benefit structure analysis: a new tool for product planning. J Mark 40(4):23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson JC, Reynolds TJ (1983) Understanding consumers’ cognitive structures: implications for advertising strategy. In: Percy L, Woodside A (eds) Advertising and consumer psychology, vol 1. Lexington Books, Lexington, pp 77–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson JC, Reynolds TJ (2001) The means-end approach to understanding consumer decision making. In: Reynolds TJ, Olson JC (eds) Understanding consumer decision making the means-end approach to marketing and advertising strategy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, London, pp 3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieters R, Baumgartner H, Allen D (1995) A means-end chain approach to consumer goal structures. Int J Res Mark 12(3):227–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preez RD, Visser E, Noordwyk HV (2008) Store image: toward a conceptual model Part 1. J Ind Psychol 34(2):50–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds F, Gutman J (1984) Laddering: extending the repertory grid methodology to construct-attribute-consequence-value hierarchies. In: Pitts RE, Woodside AG (eds) Personal values and consumer psychology. Lexington Books, Lexington, pp 155–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds TJ, Gutman J (1988) Laddering theory method, analysis, and interpretation. J Advert Res 28(1):11–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds TJ, Rochon JP (2001) Consumer segmentation based on cognitive orientations: the ChemLawn case. In: Reynolds TJ, Olson JC (eds) Understanding consumer decision making: the means-end approach to marketing and advertising strategy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 156–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds TJ, Dethloff C, Westberg SJ (2001) Advances in laddering. In: Reynolds TJ, Olson JC (eds) Understanding consumer decision making: the means-end approach to marketing and advertising strategy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 91–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach MJ (1968) Beliefs, attitudes and values. Jossey Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach MJ (1973) The nature of human values. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg MJ (1956) Cognitive structure and attitudinal affect. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 53:367–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt BH (1999) Experiential marketing: how to get customers to sense, feel, think, act, and relate to your company and brands. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheth JN, Newman BI, Gross BL (1991a) Consumption values and market choices: theory and applications. South-Western, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheth JN, Newman BI, Gross BL (1991b) Why we buy what we buy: a theory of consumption values. J Bus Res 22(2):159–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith S, Wheeler J (2002) Managing the customer experience: turning customers into advocates. Prentice Hall, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Vriens M, Hofstede FT (2000) Linking attributes, benefits, and consumer values. Mark Res 12(3):4–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner T (2007) Shopping motivation revised: a means-end chain analytical perspective. J Retail Distrib Manag 35(7):569–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yankelovich D (1981) New rules in American life: searching for self-fulfillment in a world turned upside down. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hsin-Hui Lin.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 4.

Table 4 Semantic meaning of each content term

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, HH., Chang, J. A construction of consumer cognitive structures and their implications in furniture shopping decisions: a means-end chain approach. Serv Bus 6, 197–218 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-011-0127-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-011-0127-5

Keywords

Navigation