Abstract
The main purpose of this study is to construct a hierarchical value map (HVM) based on an investigation of how consumers in Taiwan link attributes of furniture and home accessories stores with particular consequences, and how these consequences satisfy their personal values. Further, this study compares differences in consumer HVMs in terms of gender, as well as across different chain stores. This study used the means-end chain approach and laddering technique to interview 40 consumers of furniture and home accessories stores in Taiwan. We obtained six ladders regarding furniture and home accessories store consumption. From these ladders, this study found three critical store attributes (function, facility convenience, and price), four consequences that consumers care most about (shopping ease, comfort and pleasure, practicality, and integrated design), and three dominant values that consumers wish to achieve (warm family, pleasurable life, and security). The findings of this study can be used as a basis for market segmentation and the development of retail service marketing strategies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barrena R, Sanchez M (2009) Connecting product attributes with emotional benefits: analysis of a Mediterranean product across consumer age segments. Brit Food J 111(2):120–137
Gengler CE, Reynolds TJ (1995) Consumer understanding and advertising strategy: analysis and strategic translation of laddering data. J Advert Res 35(4):19–33
Grunert KG, Beckmann SC, Sorensen E (2001) Means-end chains and laddering: an inventory of problems and an agenda for research. In: Reynolds TJ, Olson JC (eds) Understanding consumer decision making: the means-end approach to marketing and advertising strategy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 63–90
Gutman J (1982) A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization process. J Mark 46(2):60–72
Haley R (1968) Benefit segmentation: a decision-oriented research tool. J Mark 32(3):30–35
Harris G, Mitchell VW (2005) The importance of consumers’ perceived risk in retail strategy. Eur J Mark 39(7/8):821–837
Howard JA (1977) Consumer behavior: application and theory. McGraw Hill, New York
Kahle LR, Kennedy P (1989) Use the list of values (LOV) to understand consumers. J Consum Mark 2(4):49–56
Kassarjian HH (1977) Content analysis in consumer research. J Consum Res 4(1):8–18
Lindquist JD (1974/1975) Meaning of image. J Retail 50(4):29–39
Martineau P (1958) Social classes and spending behavior. J Mark 23:121–130
Maslow A (1940) Test of dominance-feeling (self-esteem) in college women. J Soc Psychol 12:255–270
Mort GS, Rose T (2004) The effect of product type on value linkage in the means-end chain: Implications for theory and method. J Consum Behav 2(3):221–234
Myers JH (1976) Benefit structure analysis: a new tool for product planning. J Mark 40(4):23–32
Olson JC, Reynolds TJ (1983) Understanding consumers’ cognitive structures: implications for advertising strategy. In: Percy L, Woodside A (eds) Advertising and consumer psychology, vol 1. Lexington Books, Lexington, pp 77–90
Olson JC, Reynolds TJ (2001) The means-end approach to understanding consumer decision making. In: Reynolds TJ, Olson JC (eds) Understanding consumer decision making the means-end approach to marketing and advertising strategy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, London, pp 3–20
Pieters R, Baumgartner H, Allen D (1995) A means-end chain approach to consumer goal structures. Int J Res Mark 12(3):227–244
Preez RD, Visser E, Noordwyk HV (2008) Store image: toward a conceptual model Part 1. J Ind Psychol 34(2):50–58
Reynolds F, Gutman J (1984) Laddering: extending the repertory grid methodology to construct-attribute-consequence-value hierarchies. In: Pitts RE, Woodside AG (eds) Personal values and consumer psychology. Lexington Books, Lexington, pp 155–167
Reynolds TJ, Gutman J (1988) Laddering theory method, analysis, and interpretation. J Advert Res 28(1):11–31
Reynolds TJ, Rochon JP (2001) Consumer segmentation based on cognitive orientations: the ChemLawn case. In: Reynolds TJ, Olson JC (eds) Understanding consumer decision making: the means-end approach to marketing and advertising strategy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 156–176
Reynolds TJ, Dethloff C, Westberg SJ (2001) Advances in laddering. In: Reynolds TJ, Olson JC (eds) Understanding consumer decision making: the means-end approach to marketing and advertising strategy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 91–118
Rokeach MJ (1968) Beliefs, attitudes and values. Jossey Bass, San Francisco
Rokeach MJ (1973) The nature of human values. The Free Press, New York
Rosenberg MJ (1956) Cognitive structure and attitudinal affect. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 53:367–372
Schmitt BH (1999) Experiential marketing: how to get customers to sense, feel, think, act, and relate to your company and brands. The Free Press, New York
Sheth JN, Newman BI, Gross BL (1991a) Consumption values and market choices: theory and applications. South-Western, Cincinnati
Sheth JN, Newman BI, Gross BL (1991b) Why we buy what we buy: a theory of consumption values. J Bus Res 22(2):159–170
Smith S, Wheeler J (2002) Managing the customer experience: turning customers into advocates. Prentice Hall, UK
Vriens M, Hofstede FT (2000) Linking attributes, benefits, and consumer values. Mark Res 12(3):4–10
Wagner T (2007) Shopping motivation revised: a means-end chain analytical perspective. J Retail Distrib Manag 35(7):569–582
Yankelovich D (1981) New rules in American life: searching for self-fulfillment in a world turned upside down. Random House, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 4.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, HH., Chang, J. A construction of consumer cognitive structures and their implications in furniture shopping decisions: a means-end chain approach. Serv Bus 6, 197–218 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-011-0127-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-011-0127-5