Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of the effectiveness of nature reserve management in China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessing the management effectiveness of nature reserves is an effective way to promote management quality and achieve management targets. Using a questionnaire developed by the World Bank (WB) and the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) as a tool for tracking management effectiveness, we carried out a survey in 535 nature reserves in China to assess the management status quo in 2005. The results indicated that the indices related to management regulation, infrastructure and equipment, monitoring and evaluation, budget and community involvement produced relatively lower scores, while the indices related to management of protection targets and resources, setup of management agency and reserve boundary had better performances. The independent variables of reserve class, time since establishment, distribution region, economic condition and staff number exhibited strong correlations with the effective management of nature reserves. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to measure the association between the 3 assessment indices representing management effectiveness and other 28 assessment indices. Among these 28 assessment indices, the indices of personnel management, resource management, monitoring and evaluation, and management plan had more effects on the management effectiveness of nature reserves than other indices. When the most pressing management issues and influence factors have been identified, countermeasures can be implemented to improve the management of nature reserves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander M, Rowell TA (1999) Recent developments in management planning and monitoring on protected sites in the UK. Parks 9:50–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrie WT, McCool SF, Stankey GH (1998) Protected area planning principles and strategies. In: Lindberg K, Wood ME, Engeldrum D (eds) Ecotourism: a guide for planners and managers, vol 2. The Ecotourism Society, North Bennignton, VT, pp 133–154

  • Caro T, Gardner TA, Stoner C, Fitzherbert E, Davenport TRB (2009) Assessing the effectiveness of protected areas: paradoxes call for pluralism in evaluating conservation performance. Divers Distrib 15:178–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courrau J (1999) Strategy for monitoring the management of protected areas in Central America. http://pdf.dec.org/pdf_docs/Pnack050.pdf

  • Danielsen F, Balete DS, Poulsen MK, Enghoff M, Nozawa C, Jensen AE (2000) A simple system for monitoring biodiversity in protected areas of a developing country. Biodivers Conserv 9:1671–1705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day J, Hockings M, Jones G (2002) Measuring effectiveness in marine protected areas—principles and practice. Paper presented at World Congress on Aquatic Protected Areas, Australia

  • Dudley N, Hockings M, Stolton S (2004) Options for guaranteeing the effective management of the world’s protected areas. J Environ Policy Plan 6:131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley N, Belokurov A, Higgins-Zogib L, Hockings M, Stolton S, Burgess N (2007) Tracking progress in managing protected areas round the world. WWF International, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Ervin J (2003a) Protected area assessments in perspective. Bioscience 53:819–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ervin J (2003b) Rapid assessment and prioritization of protected area management methodology. World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer F (2008) The importance of law enforcement for protected areas: don’t step back! Be honest protect!. GAIA Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 17:101–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes TM (2006) Parks, people, and forest protection: an institutional assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas. World Dev 34:2064–2075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockings M (1998) Evaluating management of protected areas: integrating planning and evaluation. Environ Manag 22:337–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockings M (2000) Evaluating protected area management—a review of system for assessing management effectiveness of protected areas. University of Queensland, School of Natural and Rural System Management, Lawes

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockings M (2003) Systems for assessing the effectiveness of management in protected areas. Bioscience 53:823–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockings M, Stolton S, Dudley N (2002) Evaluating effectiveness—a summary for park managers and policy makers. World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) and IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockings M, Stolton S, Dudley N (2004a) Management effectiveness: assessing management of protected areas? J Environ Policy Plan 6:157–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockings M, Ervin J, Vincent G (2004b) Assessing the management of protected areas: the work of the world parks congress before and after Durban. J Int Wildl Law Policy 7:31–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockings M, Stolton S, Leverington F, Dudley N, Courrau J (2006) Evaluating effectiveness: a framework for assessing management effectiveness of protected areas, 2nd edn. IUCN, Gland

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hockings M, Cook CN, Carter RW, James R (2009) Accountability, reporting, or management improvement? Development of a state of the parks assessment system in New South Wales, Australia. Environ Manag 43:1013–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard PC, Davenport TRB, Kigenyi FW, Viskanic P, Baltzer MC, Dickinson CJ, Lwanga J, Matthews RA, Mupada E (2000) Protected area planning in the tropics: Uganda’s national system of forest nature reserves. Conserv Biol 14:858–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang L, Miao H, Ouyang Z (2006) An investigation of factors that influence the effects of management of protected areas. Acta Ecol Sin 26:3775–3781 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jim CY, Xu SW (2002) Stifled stakeholders and subdued participation: interpreting local responses toward Shimentai nature reserve in South China. Environ Manag 30:327–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lacerda L (2004) How effective are protected areas? A preliminary analysis of forest protected areas by WWF—the largest ever global assessment of protected area management effectiveness. World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) International, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Linderman M, Ouyang Z, An L, Yang J, Zhang H (2001) Ecological degradation in protected areas: the case of Wolong nature reserve for giant pandas. Science 292:98–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Ouyang Z, Pimm SL, Raven PH, Wang X, Miao H, Han N (2003) Protecting China’s biodiversity. Science 300:1240–1241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Miao H, Ouyang Z, Xu W, Zheng H (2008) Analyzing the effectiveness of community management in Chinese nature reserves. Biodivers Sci 16:389–398 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lv Y (1998) The development and planning eco-tourism. J Nat Resour 13:81–86 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules CR, Pressey Rl (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 40:243–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao H, Ouyang Z, Wang X (2006) Research on community participation mechanism of China’s nature reserves. For Res 7:57–68 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China (2007) China statistical yearbook in 2006. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2006/indexch.htm

  • Nautiyal S, Kaechele H (2007) Adverse impacts of pasture abandonment in Himalayan protected areas: testing the efficiency of a Natural Resource Management Plan (NRMP). Environ Impact Assess Rev 27:109–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemekhjargal B, Belokurov A (2005) Management effectiveness assessment of the Mongolian Protected Areas System using WWF’ RAPPAM methodology. World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), Ulaanbaatar

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang Z, Wang X, Miao H, Han N (2002) Problems of management system of China’s nature preservation zones and their solutions. Sci Technol Rev 22:49–56 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang Z, Zheng H, Miao H, Xu W (2006) Research on the fund safeguard for the reserve construction and management in China. For Res 7:53–56 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Parr CL, Woinarsk JCZ, Pienaar DJ (2009) Cornerstones of biodiversity conservation? Comparing the management effectiveness of Kruger and Kakadu National Parks, two key savanna reserves. Biodivers Conserv 18:3643–3662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullin AS, Knight TM (2005) Assessing conservation management's evidence base: a survey of management-plan compilers in the United Kingdom and Australia. Conserv Biol 19:1989–1996

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartzman S, Moreira A, Nepstad D (2000) Rethinking tropical forest conservation: perils in parks. Conserv Biol 14:1351–1357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State Environmental Protection Administration of China (2009) Report on the State of Environment in China in 2008. http://www.mep.gov.cn/pv_obj_cache/pv_obj_id_878F9C72F6B6FAF46271BF3E78BDAB3D8CB41000/filename/W020091031514285338571.pdf

  • Stem C, Margoluis R, Salafsky N, Brown M (2005) Monitoring and evaluation in conservation: a review of trends and approaches. Conserv Biol 19:295–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolton S, Dudley N (1999) A preliminary survey of management status and threats in forest protected areas. Parks 9:27–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolton S, Hockings M, Dudley N, Mackinnon K, Whitten T (2003) Reporting progress in protected areas—a site level management effectiveness tracking tool. World Wide Fund for Nature(WWF) Alliance, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolton S, Hockings M, Dudley N, Mackinnon K, Whitten T, Leverington F (2007) Management effectiveness tracking tool—reporting progress at protected area sites, 2nd edn. World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Struhsaker TT, Struhsaker PJ, Siex KS (2005) Conserving Africa’s rain forests: problems in protected areas and possible solutions. Biol Conserv 123:45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tshering K (2003) Bhutan: management effectiveness assessment of four protected areas using WWF’s RAPPAM methodology. World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyrlyshkin V, Blagovidov A, Belokurov A (2003) Russia case study: management effectiveness assessment of protected areas using WWF’s RAPPAM methodology. World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellak A, Tuvi EL, Reier Ü, Kalamees R, Roosaluste E, Zobel M, Pärtel M (2009) Past and present effectiveness of protected areas for conservation of naturally and anthropogenically rare plant species. Conserv Biol 23:750–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu JC, Melick DR (2007) Rethinking the effectiveness of public protected areas in Southwestern China. Conserv Biol 21:318–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yang C (1999) Development and challenge of natural conservation area in China. Environ Prot 2:30–33 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu A (2005) The study development on ecotourism in nature reserves. Territ Nat Resour Study 4:68–71 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Ma LC, Feng LM (2006) New challenges facing traditional nature reserves: Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) conservation in China. Integr Zool 1:179–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu G (2001) Development situation and prospect of China’s natural conservation areas. Environ Prot 2:9–31 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q (2004) Eco-tourism and ecological tourism means of nature reserves. Territ Nat Resour Study 1:69–70 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the grant from the Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (973 Program) (No. 2009CB421104), and the WB/WWF alliance project. We would like to acknowledge the state forestry administration of China, forestry departments of 31 municipalities and provinces, 634 nature reserves administration for finishing the scorecard survey. We also thank the anonymous referees for their constructive suggestions on this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiyun Ouyang.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 137 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quan, J., Ouyang, Z., Xu, W. et al. Assessment of the effectiveness of nature reserve management in China. Biodivers Conserv 20, 779–792 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9978-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9978-7

Keywords

Navigation