Abstract
According to research findings, most students who experience foreign language learning problems are thought to have overt or subtle native language learning difficulties, primarily with phonological processing. A recent study by the authors showed that when a multisensory structured language approach to teaching Spanish was used with a group of at-risk high school students, the group’s pre- and posttest scores on native language phonological processing, verbal memory and vocabulary, and foreign language aptitude measures significantly improved. In this replication and follow-up study, the authors compared pre- and posttest scores of a second group of students (Cohort 2) who received MSL instruction in Spanish on native language and foreign language aptitude measures. They also followed students from the first study (Cohort 1) over a second year of foreign language instruction. Findings showed that the second cohort made significant gains on three native language phonological measures and a test of foreign language aptitude. Follow-up testing on the first cohort showed that the group maintained its initial gains on all native language and foreign language aptitude measures. Implications for the authors’ Linguistic Coding Deficit Hypothesis are discussed and linked with current reading research, in particular the concepts of the assumption of specificity and modularity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines 1986. Hastings-on-Hudson, NY: American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.
Adams, M. 1990.Beginning to Read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brown, J., Bennett, J. M., and Hanna, G. 1981.Nelson-Denny Reading Test. Chicago IL: Riverside.
Burstall, C. 1975. Factors affecting foreign language learning: A consideration of some recent research findings.Language Teaching Abstracts 8:5–25.
Carroll, J. 1962. The prediction of success in intensive foreign language training.In R. Glaser (ed.).Training and Research in Education. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Carroll, J. 1990. Cognitive abilities in foreign language aptitude: Then and now.In T. Parry and C. Stansfield (eds.).Language Aptitude Reconsidered. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Carroll, J. and Sapon, S. 1959.Modern Language Aptitude Test. New York: Psychological Corporation.
Demuth, K., and Smith, N. (1987). The foreign language requirement: An alternative program.Foreign Language Annals 20, 67–77.
Dunn, L. and Dunn, L. 1981.Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance.
Fodor, J. 1983.Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fitz-Gibbon, C. and Morris, L. 1987.How to design program evaluation. Newbury Park, NJ: Sage Publications.
Ganschow, L. and Sparks, R. 1991. A screening instrument for foreign language learning problems: Evidence for a relationship between native and second language learning problems.Foreign Language Annals 24:383–398.
Ganschow, L., Sparks, R., Anderson, R., Javorsky, J., and Skinner, S. in press. Relationship between anxiety and language performance in high and low anxious college foreign language learners.Modern Language journal.
Ganschow, L., Sparks, R., Javorsky, J., and Patton, J. 1992. Factors relating to learning a foreign language among high- and low-risk high school students and students with learning disabilities.Applied Language Learning 3:37–63.
Ganschow, L., Sparks, R., Javorsky, J., Pohlman, J., Bishop-Marbury, A. 1991. Identifying native language difficulties among foreign language learners in college: A “foreign” language learning disability?journal of Learning Disabilities 24:530–541.
Gardner, R. 1990. Attitudes, motivation, and personality as predictors of success in foreign language learning.In T. Parry and C. Stansfield (eds.).Language Aptitude Reconsidered. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Gardner, R. and Lambert W. 1972.Attitude and Motivation in Second Language Learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Hall, J. and Humphreys, M. 1982. Research on specific learning disabilities: Deficits and remediation.Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities 2:19–26.
Hammill, D. and Larsen, S. 1988.Test of Written Language-2. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Hermann, G. 1980. Attitudes and success in children’s learning of English as a second language: The motivational vs. resultative hypothesis.English Language Teaching Journal 34:247–254.
Horwitz, E., Horwitz, M., and Cope J. 1986. Foreign language classroom anxiety.Modem Language journal 70:125–132.
Horwitz, E. and Young, D. 1991.Language Anxiety: From Theory and Research to Classroom Implications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Jastak, S. and Wilkinson, G. 1984.Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.
Javorsky, J., Sparks, R., and Ganschow, L. 1992. Perceptions of college students with and without learning disabilities about foreign language courses.Learning Disabilities: Research and Practice 7:31–44.
Kenneweg, S. 1988. Meeting special learning needs in the Spanish curriculum of a college preparatory high school.In B. Snyder (ed.).Get Ready, Get Set, Go! Action in the foreign language classroom. Columbus, OH: Ohio Foreign Language Association.
Krashen, S. 1982.Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. New York: Pergamon Press.
Liberman, A. and Mattingly, I. 1985. The motor theory of speech perception revised.Cognition 21:1–36.
Lindamood, P. and Lindamood, C. 1979.Lindamood Auditory Conceptualization Test. Allen Park, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.
Myer, B., Ganschow, L., Sparks, R., and Kenneweg, S. 1989. Cracking the code: Helping students with specific learning disabilities.In D. McAlpine (ed.).Defining the Essentials for the Foreign Language Classroom. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.
Oxford, R. 1990. Styles, strategies, and aptitude: Connections for language learning.In T. Parry and C. Stansfield (eds.).Language Aptitude Reconsidered. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Pimsleur, P., Sundland, D., and Mclntyre, R. 1964. Underachievement in foreign language learning.International Review of Applied Linguistics 2:43–50.
Skehan, P. 1986. The role of foreign language aptitude in a model of school learning.Language Testing 3:188–221.
Skehan, P. 1991. Individual differences in second language learning.Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13:275–298.
Sparks, R., and Ganschow, L. 1991. Foreign language learning difficulties: Affective or native language aptitude differences?Modern Language Journal 75:3–16.
Sparks, R. and Ganschow, L. 1993a. The impact of native language learning problems on foreign language learning: Case study illustrations of the Linguistic Coding Deficit Hypothesis.Modern Language Journal 77:58–74.
Sparks, R. and Ganschow, L. 1993b. Does the study of Latin affect the native and foreign language aptitude skills of students with and without learning disabilities? In preparation.
Sparks, R., and Ganschow, L. In press. Searching for the cognitive locus of foreign language learning difficulties: Linking native and foreign language learning.Modern Language Journal.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., and Javorsky, J. 1992. Diagnosing and accommodating the foreign language learning difficulties of college students with learning disabilities.Learning Disabilities: Research and Practice 7:150–160.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., and Javorsky, J. in press. Perceptions of low and high risk students and students with learning disabilities about high school foreign language courses.Foreign Language Annals.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Javorsky, J., Pohlman, J., and Patton, J. 1992a. Test comparisons among students identified as high-risk, low-risk, and learning disabled in high school foreign language courses.Modern Language Journal 76:142–159.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Javorsky, J., Pohlman, J., and Patton, J. 1992b. Identifying native language deficits in high and low risk foreign language learners in high school.Foreign Language Annals 25:403–418.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Kenneweg, S., and Miller, K. 1991. Use of an Orton-Gillingham approach to teach a foreign language to dyslexic/learning disabled students: Explicit teaching of phonology in a second language.Annals of Dyslexia 41:96–118.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., and Patton, J. 1993. Predictors of student performance in first-year high school foreign language courses. (Manuscript submitted for publication)
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., and Pohlman, J. 1989. Linguistic coding deficits in foreign language learners.Annals of Dyslexia 39:179–195.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Pohlman, J., Skinner, S., and Artzer, M. 1992. The effects of multisensory, structured language instruction on native language and foreign language aptitude skills of at-risk high school foreign language learners.Annals of Dyslexia 42:25–53.
Stanovich, K. 1986. Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy.Reading Research Quarterly 21:360–407.
Stanovich, K. 1988. The right and wrong places to look for the cognitive locus of reading disability.Annals of Dyslexia 38:154–177.
Terrell, T. 1977. A natural approach to second language acquisition and learning.Modern Language Journal 61:325–337.
Terrell, T. 1982. The natural approach to language teaching: An update.Modern Language Journal 66:121–132.
Vellutino, F. and Scanion, D. 1986. Linguistic coding and metalinguistic awareness: Their relationship to verbal and code acquisition in poor and normal readers.In D. Yaden and S. Templeton (eds.).Metalinguistic Awareness and Beginning Literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Woodcock, R. 1987.Woodcock Reading Mastery Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance.
Woodcock, R. and Johnson, M. B. 1978.Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery. Allen Park, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sparks, R.L., Ganschow, L. The effects of multisensory structured language instruction on native language and foreign language aptitude skills of at-risk high school foreign language learners: A replication and follow-up study. Annals of Dyslexia 43, 194–216 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02928182
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02928182