View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
i4dnf Apprentice
Joined: 18 Sep 2005 Posts: 271 Location: Bucharest, Romania
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tony0945 Watchman
Joined: 25 Jul 2006 Posts: 5127 Location: Illinois, USA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 2:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe it is time to switch to FreeBsd. I'm so sick of this LP crap polluting Linux. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tony0945 Watchman
Joined: 25 Jul 2006 Posts: 5127 Location: Illinois, USA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Zucca wrote: | All the lockups at boot time are the worst in systemd. Most of the time emergency.target and recovery.target don't help. I cannot log in. |
If you copy Windows architecture, you get Windows behavior. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Zucca Moderator
Joined: 14 Jun 2007 Posts: 3346 Location: Rasi, Finland
|
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 3:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tony0945 wrote: | Zucca wrote: | All the lockups at boot time are the worst in systemd. Most of the time emergency.target and recovery.target don't help. I cannot log in. |
If you copy Windows architecture, you get Windows behavior. | True.
But it's not all bad. I don't mind having .ini files as service "scripts". And I like the built-in tmpfiles thingy. Also the timer functions are nice bonus.
However... So far, the more I use systemd the more it bugs me.
I've chosen OpenRC for Raspberry Pi and I will use it on my home server too...
On my old laptop systemd and pulse audio are the ones that take most of the CPUtime when the machine idles. I mean easily. It's like 30 times more than any other bg process. I've installed Fedora on it.
Systemd fails badly in the design that makes every part as dependency. It would be much better if I could choose what parts to compile in. Journald would be the first to leave. _________________ ..: Zucca :..
Gentoo IRC channels reside on Libera.Chat.
--
Quote: | I am NaN! I am a man! |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mir3x Guru
Joined: 02 Jun 2012 Posts: 455
|
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Im working on new revolutionary init manager.
Its called systemdC ( aka system clown or system cool ).
It features:
binary configs
binary logs
binary source code.
+ Awesome Swiss Knife - called regedit ( gui version only)
But its possible to compile newest systemC via systemC gui. It will decompress binary source code for u.
systemC is very modular, each binary file is splited into 100 modular pieces, but they can be combined
into one big blob via systemC gui ( each piece can be splited into another 100 pieces - recursive
modularization - thats f*cikng awesome !!!)
Like every good program is written entirely in Java. My experts are working on pushing javaVM into kernel.
So it will be even faster soon.
Many project developers already agreed to come under systemC umbrella.
Eg. KF6 will require regedit to work, also Im working with GIMP devs on it. GIMP 3.0 will rock with regedit.
( It would be shame not to use such awesome Swiss Army Knife )
Did I mentioned that it also shows advertisements to users so they can click on them and earn cash?
Ofc it has all systemD funcionality with kdbus, bus1, bus 5 and bus43.
If u have some feature wishlist pls write. Everything is cool. Dont be ashemed.
I think add feature to sniff browser input, so there won be need to browse porns, they will be shown on desktop just after login.
Early test shows it 3 times faster than systemD.
Hold on, its coming ....
Always 3 steap ahead of systemD - systemC
Share yout thoughts !
LENNART POETTERING -I MARK YOUR SOUL
--
d3vil _________________ Sent from Windows |
|
Back to top |
|
|
depontius Advocate
Joined: 05 May 2004 Posts: 3509
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
tld Veteran
Joined: 09 Dec 2003 Posts: 1816
|
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What's the deal anyway...for how long they pushed and pushed to get kdbus in the kernel, and now it's "forget that piece of crap...bus1 is the wave of the future!". Am I understanding that one correctly. Someone needs to smack these guys into the next universe. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ant P. Watchman
Joined: 18 Apr 2009 Posts: 6920
|
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kdbus really was a piece of crap. At least Bus1 looks like it might be useful outside of the systemd insanity. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
axl Veteran
Joined: 11 Oct 2002 Posts: 1144 Location: Romania
|
Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2016 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i discovered recently --list-boots and -b --boot noid in journalctl.
just to offer some balance to the discussion. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
djdunn l33t
Joined: 26 Dec 2004 Posts: 810
|
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 1:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
im starting to wonder how long this garbage will be around before people get bored of it and do something else _________________ “Music is a moral law. It gives a soul to the Universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination, a charm to sadness, gaiety and life to everything. It is the essence of order, and leads to all that is good and just and beautiful.”
― Plato |
|
Back to top |
|
|
i4dnf Apprentice
Joined: 18 Sep 2005 Posts: 271 Location: Bucharest, Romania
|
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 11:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Anyone following this (tmpfiles support in openrc not so much in openrc anymore):
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/319598
Dunno why, but that thread gives me a bad vibe. _________________ "The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not MAD" (SALVATOR DALI) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gwr Apprentice
Joined: 19 Nov 2014 Posts: 194
|
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have been following it. This quote demonstrates, quite clearly I think, I backwards reasoning needed to deal with systemd:
Quote: | Wait, so you're going to require systemd have a PDEPEND on
opentmpfiles, so that OpenRC doesn't need to have one, when it's
openrc that needs the script files that opentmpfiles installs?? |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
gwr Apprentice
Joined: 19 Nov 2014 Posts: 194
|
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Also, there's this.
systemd Portable System Services
https://lwn.net/Articles/706025/
So, containers, but not containers? I have to admit I don't fully understand the necessity for this. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
i4dnf Apprentice
Joined: 18 Sep 2005 Posts: 271 Location: Bucharest, Romania
|
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
In this case I'm somewhat undecided if that proves backwards reasoning needed when dealing with systemd, or simply backwards reasoning from a certain dev... _________________ "The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not MAD" (SALVATOR DALI) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gwr Apprentice
Joined: 19 Nov 2014 Posts: 194
|
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 11:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
i4dnf wrote: | In this case I'm somewhat undecided if that proves backwards reasoning needed when dealing with systemd, or simply backwards reasoning from a certain dev... |
Noted! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
depontius Advocate
Joined: 05 May 2004 Posts: 3509
|
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 1:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
gwr wrote: | Also, there's this.
systemd Portable System Services
https://lwn.net/Articles/706025/
So, containers, but not containers? I have to admit I don't fully understand the necessity for this. |
I think I may have hit this one quite some time ago...
I believe they are poising containers as the new secure application distribution mechanism. Your applications no longer run on a system, they run in a container. Next you make the "systems interface" of the container systemd-based. From the inside of the container, systemd IS the OS.
Don't confuse necessity with L.P.'s ambition.
BTW, It might be a path to better security - UNTIL they realize that separate containerized applications need to exchange data, and invent systemd-OLE or systemd-ActiveX, or whatever you want to call it. Then they'll drill holes through all of the security that containers added, turning it into Swiss cheese. Oh, but it will be "audited" code. _________________ .sigs waste space and bandwidth |
|
Back to top |
|
|
C5ace Guru
Joined: 23 Dec 2013 Posts: 473 Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why the complications?
Just make separate and fully independent Gentoo openRC and Gentoo systemd distributions. This would prevent infection of Gentoo openRC by systemd bus and oter problems. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ct85711 Veteran
Joined: 27 Sep 2005 Posts: 1791
|
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh, this part of where the "containers" having a volatile file system instance is going to break various software. One thing I have been noticing, is software likes to initialize and configure it's self on the first time it is ran, and just reload it's configs every other time when it loads. So it's not too far, to start realizing all these programs that have an extensive first startup routine will have to go through it every time it's loaded...
Then we get to the part of websites ran on the server... You have fun explaining why any changes done to the site(s) no longer stays when you restart the server, or even better, to your mysql database. Or even explain what kind of permissions some of these system management web portals need; to manage the entire system, since they need access to access every other service configurations and be able to start/stop them. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tony0945 Watchman
Joined: 25 Jul 2006 Posts: 5127 Location: Illinois, USA
|
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 3:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
C5ace wrote: | Why the complications?
Just make separate and fully independent Gentoo openRC and Gentoo systemd distributions. This would prevent infection of Gentoo openRC by systemd bus and oter problems. | I've said before that Gentoo needs to be forked like Debian. The philosophies are too disparate. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
depontius Advocate
Joined: 05 May 2004 Posts: 3509
|
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
C5ace wrote: | Why the complications?
Just make separate and fully independent Gentoo openRC and Gentoo systemd distributions. This would prevent infection of Gentoo openRC by systemd bus and oter problems. |
Because.... systemd! _________________ .sigs waste space and bandwidth |
|
Back to top |
|
|
laineg n00b
Joined: 13 Nov 2016 Posts: 3
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
gwr Apprentice
Joined: 19 Nov 2014 Posts: 194
|
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2016 12:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
C5ace wrote: | Why the complications?
Just make separate and fully independent Gentoo openRC and Gentoo systemd distributions. This would prevent infection of Gentoo openRC by systemd bus and oter problems. |
I guess if you could easily do that, then you could easily have a use flag to toggle between the two. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Amity88 Apprentice
Joined: 03 Jul 2010 Posts: 260 Location: Third planet from the Sun
|
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2016 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I came back to using Linux on my main laptop after a hiatus at Windows land only to find that SystemD is getting shoved down our throats these days and I can't believe that this kind of BS actually gained traction in the FOSS world. In the past, I've briefly used SystemD on my Arch installs and it was kinda okay, I was only slightly uncomfortable with the binary logs and nothing else.
These days I see that they're sticking their thumb into more daemons, it's almost like they're forking off Linux. Actually it's more like a hostile takeover and the worst part is that it's a friggin monolith just like Windows and even worse, the devs don't care much about the bugs and only wanna expand at any cost. All of this is making me feel really uncomfortable thinking about what's gonna happen to Linux in the near future. They are forcing their hand, they are taking away my choices with the way they've 'infected' every other distro. I don't understand how an upstart project like that got the kind of authority that the Linux kernel got.
My fears maybe unfounded (I hope it is) but it feels like they're wrapping their tentacles around the Linux OS as a whole and do some sort of vendor lock-in. I'm gonna ditch SystemD before that happens (if it does) and not gonna update my system except for security patches. The way things are going, I think all distros are eventually going to have to work with SystemD. My concerns seemed to have already been addressed by others in this thread previously in detail. It's pissing off how they're taking away other people's choices, those asshats. _________________
Ant P. wrote: | The enterprise distros sell their binaries. Canonical sells their users. |
Also... Be ignorant... Be happy! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
depontius Advocate
Joined: 05 May 2004 Posts: 3509
|
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2016 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Linux has picked up enough newcomers from Windows that SystemD brings them back to their comfort zone. I fear we old-timers have become a minority in our own land.
Prediction: SystemD will become moribund. They've been swallowing everything, taking once well-defined external interfaces and turning them into poorly-defined internal interfaces. Given a bit more time and SystemD will slow to a crawl, by its own weight. Right now it looks nimble because they're not afraid to do things that really ought not to be done. That will change. _________________ .sigs waste space and bandwidth |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mrbassie l33t
Joined: 31 May 2013 Posts: 772 Location: over here
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|