skip to main content
research-article

Spatial Consensus Queries in a Collaborative Environment

Authors Info & Claims
Published:30 March 2016Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We introduce a new type of query for a location-based social network platform. Consider a scenario in which a group of users is trying to find a common meeting location, yet attempting to include all group members is introducing a significant traveling cost to most of them. In this article, we formulate a new query type called the consensus query, which can be used to help users explore these trade-off options to find a solution upon which everyone can agree. Specifically, we study the problem of evaluating consensus queries in the context of nearest neighbor queries, where the group is interested in finding a meeting place that minimizes the travel distance for at least a specified number of group members. To help the group in selecting a suitable solution, the major challenge is to find optimal subgroups of all allowable subgroup sizes, i.e., greater or equal to the minimum specified subgroup size, that minimize the travel distances. We develop incremental algorithms to evaluate in one pass the optimal query subgroups of different sizes along with their corresponding nearest data points. These subsets, which are evaluated by the location-based service provider, constitute the answer set that is returned to the group. The group then collaboratively selects the final answer from the candidate answer set. An extensive experimental study shows the efficiency and effectiveness of our proposed techniques.

References

  1. Norbert Beckmann, Hans-Peter Kriegel, Ralf Schneider, and Bernhard Seeger. 1990. The R*-tree: An efficient and robust access method for points and rectangles. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD’90). 322--331.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Xin Cao, Gao Cong, Christian S. Jensen, and Beng Chin Ooi. 2011. Collective spatial keyword querying. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD’11). 373--384.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Lisi Chen, Gao Cong, Christian S. Jensen, and Dingming Wu. 2013. Spatial keyword query processing: An experimental evaluation. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 6, 3, 217--228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chi-Yin Chow, Jie Bao, and Mohamed F. Mokbel. 2010. Towards location-based social networking services. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on LBSN. 31--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ke Deng, Shazia Wasim Sadiq, Xiaofang Zhou, Hu Xu, Gabriel Pui Cheong Fung, and Yansheng Lu. 2012. On group nearest group query processing. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 24, 2, 295--308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ian De Felipe, Vagelis Hristidis, and Naphtali Rishe. 2008. Keyword search on spatial databases. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE’08). 656--665.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Facebook Places. 2016. Retrieved March 20, 2016 from http://www.facebook.com/, http://www.facebook.com/places/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Sébastien Ferré and Alice Hermann. 2011. Semantic search: Reconciling expressive querying and exploratory search. In The Semantic Web—ISWC 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7031. Springer, 177--192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Foursquare. 2016. Retrieved March 20, 2016 from http://foursquare.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mike Gartrell, Xinyu Xing, Qin Lv, Aaron Beach, Richard Han, Shivakant Mishra, and Karim Seada. 2010. Enhancing group recommendation by incorporating social relationship interactions. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP’10). 97--106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Antonin Guttman. 1984. R-trees: A dynamic index structure for spatial searching. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD’84). 47--57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Tanzima Hashem, Tahrima Hashem, Mohammed Eunus Ali, and Lars Kulik. 2013. Group trip planning queries in spatial databases. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Advances in Spatial and Temporal Databases (SSTD’13). 259--276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Gisli R. Hjaltason and Hanan Samet. 1995. Ranking in spatial databases. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Advances in Spatial Databases (SSD’95). 83--95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Anthony Jameson and Barry Smyth. 2007. Recommendation to groups. In The Adaptive Web. Springer, 596--627.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Christian S. Jensen, Jan Kolářvr, Torben Bach Pedersen, and Igor Timko. 2003. Nearest neighbor queries in road networks. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM International Symposium on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (GIS’03). 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Anastasios Kementsietsidis, Frank Neven, Dieter Van de Craen, and Stijn Vansummeren. 2008. Scalable multi-query optimization for exploratory queries over federated scientific databases. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 1, 1, 16--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mohammad Kolahdouzan and Cyrus Shahabi. 2004. Voronoi-based K nearest neighbor search for spatial network databases. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB’04). 840--851.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Yang Li, Feifei Li, Ke Yi, Bin Yao, and Min Wang. 2011. Flexible aggregate similarity search. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD’11). 1009--1020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Sarah Masud, Farhana Murtaza Choudhury, Mohammed Eunus Ali, and Sarana Nutanong. 2013. Maximum visibility queries in spatial databases. In Proceedings of the IEEE 29th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE’13). 637--648.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Dimitris Papadias, Qiongmao Shen, Yufei Tao, and Kyriakos Mouratidis. 2004. Group nearest neighbor queries. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE’04). 301--310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Dimitris Papadias, Yufei Tao, Kyriakos Mouratidis, and Chun Kit Hui. 2005. Aggregate nearest neighbor queries in spatial databases. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 30, 2, 529--576.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Dimitris Papadias, Jun Zhang, Nikos Mamoulis, and Yufei Tao. 2003. Query processing in spatial network databases. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB’03). 802--813.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. João B. Rocha-Junior and Kjetil Nørvåg. 2012. Top-k spatial keyword queries on road networks. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT’12). 168--179.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Nick Roussopoulos, Stephen Kelley, and Frédéric Vincent. 1995. Nearest neighbor queries. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD’95). 71--79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Takeshi Sakaki, Makoto Okazaki, and Yutaka Matsuo. 2010. Earthquake shakes Twitter users: Real-time event detection by social sensors. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’10). 851--860.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Thomas Seidl and Hans-Peter Kriegel. 1998. Optimal multi-step k-nearest neighbor search. SIGMOD Record 27, 2, 154--165.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Jing Shan, Donghui Zhang, and Betty Salzberg. 2003. On spatial-range closest-pair query. In Advances in Spatial and Temporal Databases. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2750. Springer, 252--269.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Ben Shneiderman. 1994. Dynamic queries for visual information seeking. IEEE Software 11, 6, 70--77.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Xiance Si, Edward Y. Chang, Zoltán Gyöngyi, and Maosong Sun. 2010. Confucius and its intelligent disciples: Integrating social with search. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 3, 2, 1505--1516.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Wechat. 2016. Retrieved March 20, 2016 from http://web.wechat.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. E Welzl. 1991. Smallest enclosing disks (balls and ellipsoids). In New Results and New Trends in Computer Science. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 555. Springer, 359--370.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Chenyi Xia, Hongjun Lu, Beng Chin Ooi, and Jin Hu. 2004. Gorder: An efficient method for KNN join processing. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB’04). 756--767.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. De-Nian Yang, Chih-Ya Shen, Wang-Chien Lee, and Ming-Syan Chen. 2012. On socio-spatial group query for location-based social networks. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’12). 949--957.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Man Lung Yiu, Nikos Mamoulis, and Dimitris Papadias. 2005. Aggregate nearest neighbor queries in road networks. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 17, 820--833.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Tjalling J. Ypma. 1995. Historical development of the Newton-Raphson method. SIAM Review 37, 4, 531--551.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Zhiyong Yu, Zhiwen Yu, Xingshe Zhou, and Yuichi Nakamura. 2009. Handling conditional preferences in recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’09). 407--412.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Jinzeng Zhang, Xiaofeng Meng, Xuan Zhou, and Dongqi Liu. 2012. Co-spatial searcher: Efficient tag-based collaborative spatial search on geo-social network. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications (DASFAA’12), Vol. Part 1. 560--575.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Yu Zheng, Xing Xie, and Wei-Ying Ma. 2010. GeoLife: A collaborative social networking service among user, location and trajectory. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin 33, 2, 32--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Spatial Consensus Queries in a Collaborative Environment

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems
      ACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems  Volume 2, Issue 1
      April 2016
      150 pages
      ISSN:2374-0353
      EISSN:2374-0361
      DOI:10.1145/2903758
      • Editor:
      • Hanan Samet
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 March 2016
      • Accepted: 1 September 2015
      • Revised: 1 July 2015
      • Received: 1 March 2014
      Published in tsas Volume 2, Issue 1

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader